2.28.2010

Pin-up.

Marina Abramovic, scattata da Francesco Carrozzini per Vogue Italia


"In the performance you have to be in control.
Maria Callas once said, “When you perform, half of the brain has to be in complete control
and the other half of the brain has to be at a complete loss.”
That is the essence of what I want to say.
You have to balance these two."
--MA, interviewed by Laurie Anderson for BOMB magazine


MARINA ABRAMOVIC: THE ARTIST IS PRESENT
curated by: Klaus Biesenbach
March 14 -- May 31, 2010
Museum of Modern Art, NY

Read More

2.22.2010

Brave New World.

Exhibit A:

Monica Bellucci in Vogue Italia, early 1990's.



Exhibit B:

Read More

2.21.2010

Caprice, Then and Now

Goya y Lucientes. Caprichos Plate 2: El sueño de la razón produce monstruos

Goya y Lucientes. Caprichos Plate 2: El si pronuncian y la mano alargan Al primero que llega.




Yinka Shonibare. The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters (Australia), 2007.

Yinka Shonibare. Gallantry and Conversation, 2002.




Read More

2.17.2010

Revisiting: The Frick







Ultimately, I would argue that the inclusion of the mirror in the Comtesse d’Haussonville represented a solution to the rendering of a personality that defied being complacently transmuted into oil paint. This claim finds support in a statement made by the Comtesse herself in her biopic of Lord Byron: “Usually, where women have been put is where they stay, with the vague idea, instilled since infancy, that women are made for suffering—even while they now and then amuse themselves as a distraction from the sad fate society has in store for them.” The comtesse, as rendered in her namesake portrait, is a “difficult” woman: she refuses to acknowledge her “place”—that is, facing the mirror, refusing all the same to fatuously amuse herself with the distraction of looking at herself in the mirror. Instead she finds solace in the contemplation of something presumably beyond her image, and in doing so, evades banalization. It remains the viewer’s task to discern the two “worlds” manifest in the painting: the harshly illuminated world of the subject, in which the presence of the figure dominates over the minor curvature of strategically placed props, as opposed to the “world of simulacra” in which the subject’s reflection is imprisoned in a depthless expanse of murkiness.

The most clever details captured in the mirror are the details ‘unseen’ in the frontal view of the comtesse: the subtle scooping of the collar of her dress, a beautiful satin bow tied into her coiffure, and finally, a brown comb that secures her chignon. The mirror as “world of simulacra” alludes to the inherent function of the oil painting and its maker-- where measure for measure, satin bow for satin bow, reality is simultaneously masked and revealed, for perpetuity.


Read More

1.16.2010

Géricault's Raft: A Metaphor for Haiti

Photo, Damon Winter/ The New York Times


Géricault, Théodore. The Raft of the Medusa, 1819. Oil on canvas; 193 1/4 x 282 inches. Musée du Louvre, Paris.


The images streaming in on the New York Times website from the disaster in Haiti are essentially, images of ghosts. Photographs depict pileups of the dead on dusty streets. Shockingly, the corpse of an infant lay on the top of one of these piles in the photograph I have singled out from the series above.

Harrowing, haunting, perturbing, and profoundly moving,
the photographs were taken with a primary objective in mind:
to bring the damages and deaths in Haiti clearly into the vision of a greater populace.
No one can refute the fact that these images function as photo reportage.

I am inspired, however, to view in these images an overlapping purposiveness: a revolutionary artistic statement which acknowledges the media and communications atmosphere of the zeitgeist, while appealing to the sensibilities of one radical, monumental antecedent, Géricault's The Raft of the Medusa.

Géricault's 1819 work currently hangs in the Louvre, perhaps the most hallowed art institution
in the world. It's hard to believe today that the painting was the source of outrage when debuted in the 1819 Salon of Paris. Géricault knowingly chose to paint the provocative narrative scene that did not come from classical mythology or religion -- but rather, straight out of the tabloids of his day -- in an effort to launch his career as an artist.

In its literal, historical interpretation, the painting serves to document a tragic event that otherwise would have been suppressed by the French government -- the shipwreck of a French boat off the coast of North Africa, in which the captain of the boat left the 149-person crew to die at sea. The crew spent an alleged 4 to 5 days at sea, floating on a makeshift raft fashioned out of debris. By the time the crew was rescued by another ship, only 15 people had survived.

One look at the painting, and we are exposed to an unabashed portrayal of humanity at its bleakest. The figures that make up the composition of the painting are tinged a bilious, sea green. They are framed in a pathetic, yet purposively tenacious struggle as they clamor to reach the attention of a distant ship located on the vanishing horizon. Corpses festoon the immediate foreground of the painting. The aesthetic value of the painting cannot be wholly contemplated without some knowledge of the event taking place.

Géricault masterfully depicts the human descent into darkness, madness, and death. Although there is evidence of cosmetic consideration taken here, the image is in no way "clean" -- the artist is known to have studied the corpses of morgues in order to more faithfully record the contours, shape, and sinews of the human body. The great parable lurking beneath the obvious is one that refers to a tragedy caused and exacerbated by those deemed in authority and control.

Referring to Haiti, the photographer was faced with the daunting task of delivering to the public a visual account of the damage that took place after the devastating earthquake. The photos that result on the website are unrestrained, yet carefully curated selections. These photographs, as explicit in their presentation of death as war zone imagery, reach today's viewer much in the same way images of Vietnam reached shocked viewers in the 60's and 70's.
In the age of twitter and "real time", these photographs both document a distinct moment in time, even a distinct point in the aftermath of the earthquake.

By far the most profoundly disturbing image in the series is the one which I've included in this post. In it, a pile of unknown corpses lie disarrayed outside of a morgue, partially obscured in the shade. Among these nameless dead is an infant, lying on top of the pile near the immediate foreground. To the viewer's right, a man sits, framed in a position which suggests sobbing. In the photos caption, we are told that the man sobbing at right is the infant's
father.

The photograph is such a well-curated image that it aesthetically compares to The Raft of the Medusa. In the same manner that Géricault props his bodies, inventing their death poses,
the bodies of the fallen Haitians scatter the expanse of the photograph, littered throughout the ground with little observance or attention from any nameable force except the grieving father.

Both artists give form and expression to ineffable, inexpressible depths, documenting
these moments, but also giving them up to God.


Read More